and the fake qualifier
lol
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
propensity within someone
as in
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
autonomy of learning
not their contents
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
its performative
division of reality is straying away from it
and the fake qualifier
we need to be deconstructing our identities
i love it here
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.
plato
feel you
bro i read nothing in my life
all that is to say
Their voices are saying they haven't and shouldn't fuck but want to so bad, or have fucked and can't again but want to so bad, or something like that. Would this be easier if they were birds? Incel kind of question... I'm not following the conversation, but I'm still listening. He's talking in this slightly begging way. It's a way of talking that asks for pity, like he's already tried appealing to every other one of her sensibilities. Incel kind of observation... Maybe he just talks like that, in some upspeak derivative. Haha unless?