we want to live the knowledge too live the content
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
that looks like my instagram account
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
so at the end
autonomy of learning
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
division of reality is straying away from it
much more tactility
i dont understand magnetisation
no like which do people call me
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
its good short few pages
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
we need to be deconstructing our identities
plato
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
i really havent
Thank you, Jack
The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.
have you read
lol yea
Thank you, Jack