nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
division of reality is straying away from it
so the method has to be autonomous
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
no i haven't really read anything
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
its good
its good short few pages
i understand
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
magnetisation/form
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
i was tempted to lie about my name
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
whats your name?
we can only engage in such a way
sorry i am texting like a slav
all that is to say
somewhere between instagram and chatgpt
I wonder if she knew I was down there listening? I wonder if she would've said something more true, more personal, more raw, more heartfelt, more harsh, more seductive, more freeing, more exposing, more risky, more romantic, more rude, more honest, more anything, if there hadn't been an audience.
Thank you, Jack
no longer writing in the third person