no like which do people call me

i dont understand magnetisation

Thank you, Jack

i have read not even 1 book

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

like first name

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

all that is to say

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

we need to be deconstructing our identities

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

you cannot feed someone truth

no i haven't really read anything

its good

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

what do you think my name is

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!


Lift Analysis

i understand

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

...