i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

autonomy of learning

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

yeah

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

we need to be deconstructing our identities

all that is to say

lol yea

ion

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

or never left

plato

no like which do people call me

brb i will read and reply sincerely

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

fw

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

what do you mean

a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine

that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.

its good short few pages

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt

its good

which magnetises chains of pins

we can only engage in such a way

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.