i believe search always should be immersive, because whatever is pre planned and non consuming (what you are looking for is total engulfment by the spectre of the real), a joyous intensity, a flow of virtue

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

which magnetises chains of pins

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

its good short few pages

all that is to say

send your tumblr

its performative

plato

no i haven't really read anything

sorry i am texting like a slav

much more tactility

your feed looks like my tumblr

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

its good

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

thank you

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

magnetises a pin

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

isaac newton

we can only engage in such a way

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

i understand

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things