fw
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
was it worth it
like first name
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
that looks like my instagram account
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
propensity within someone
magnetisation/form
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
send your tumblr
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
bro i read nothing in my life
or never left
have you read
no i haven't really read anything
god being the centre magnet
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
hello reader,
which magnetises chains of pins
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
bro i read nothing in my life
so at the end
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
plato
its good
Thank you, Jack
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet