the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

magnetisation/form

i have read not even 1 book

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

isaac newton

as in

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

i understand

plato

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

its good

bro i read nothing in my life

which magnetises chains of pins

and the fake qualifier

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

lol yea

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

so the method has to be autonomous

its good short few pages

i dont understand magnetisation

autonomy of learning

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

is this you as well

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

not their contents

idk

yeah

propensity within someone