Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:38:49
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
i dont understand magnetisation
is this you as well
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
isaac
thank you
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
was it worth it
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
autonomy of learning
ion
i really havent
we can only engage in such a way
no i haven't really read anything
division of reality is straying away from it
you cannot feed someone truth
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i really havent
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
its performative
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
hello reader,
but really the thing should be autonomous
abrar?
like first name