...
propensity within someone
all that is to say
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
so the method has to be autonomous
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
much more tactility
is everyoneback on tumblr now
like first name
its good short few pages
its good
whats your name?
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.
i have read not even 1 book
no like which do people call me
Wed, 11 Nov 2025 21:12:41
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
and the fake qualifier