plato

and the fake qualifier

its good

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

what do you mean

i dont understand magnetisation

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

have you read

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

magnetisation/form

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

we need to be deconstructing our identities

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

so at the end

But seriously, thank you, Jack

They're fucking around with the box. I ask her what people do with fireworks for so long before they're ready to light. She doesn't know.

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

idk

And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.

plato

so an active mazelike process

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

Slug

its good