ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
isaac newton
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
sorry i am texting like a slav
idk
plato
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
propensity within someone
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
as in
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
so the method has to be autonomous
you cannot feed someone truth
plato
is this you as well
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
ion
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
so at the end
your feed looks like my tumblr
barren land
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
division of reality is straying away from it
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.
no i haven't really read anything
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
I am below everything.
have you read