not their contents

all that is to say

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt

much more tactility

whats your name?

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

like magnets

barren land

the point of this was to try and avoid this narcissistic death spiral I'm in by acting anonymously and impulsively. how can that feeling that even Jack can't describe paralyse me if my name isn't next to any of this? the excitement of believing I just need a new process has overcome me and I have cummed out an empty webpage.

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.

have you read

Today I felt like starting

feel you

IWGD

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

hiding from the rain