god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

so at the end

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

what do you mean

plato

all that is to say

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i want to do that too

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

so an active mazelike process

bro i read nothing in my life

its good

no i haven't really read anything

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

its good

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

fw

magnetises a pin

i understand

yeah

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet


my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

not their contents

have you read

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.

you have a beautiful account btw

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.