god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
so at the end
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
what do you mean
plato
all that is to say
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
i want to do that too
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
so an active mazelike process
bro i read nothing in my life
its good
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
its good
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
fw
magnetises a pin
yeah
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
not their contents
have you read
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.
you have a beautiful account btw
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.