i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me
lol yea
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
you cannot feed someone truth
propensity within someone
as in
fw
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
that looks like my instagram account
autonomy of learning
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.
so an active mazelike process
whats your name?
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
god being the centre magnet
have you read
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i love to walk around and see things and take photos and go online and look at websites and click on links and take screenshots i love to surf and i love to browse