you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

ahnaf abrar

i understand

god being the centre magnet

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

yeah

so at the end

its good short few pages

thank you

which magnetises chains of pins

so the method has to be autonomous

send your tumblr

kind of mythopoesis

idk


After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

have you read

we can only engage in such a way

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

it is hopeful

no i haven't really read anything

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

sorry i am texting like a slav