as in
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
We gather around the start of a causeway down to the Thames. It's a pretty cold night and there's a breeze coming off the river.
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
Maybe, Jack, I'm doing this because I'm English?
Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
autonomy of learning
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
lol
yeah
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
or never left
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
barren land
send link
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
wait what is that
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
so the method has to be autonomous
Windrush Art Kid Oligarch
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book