i dont understand magnetisation
have you read
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
sorry i am texting like a slav
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
whats your name?
thank you
isaac newton
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
you cannot feed someone truth
or never left
propensity within someone
like first name
its good
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
no i haven't really read anything
ion
is everyoneback on tumblr now
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
i love it here
like magnets
bro i read nothing in my life
was it worth it
which magnetises chains of pins
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
your feed looks like my tumblr
a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.
I created this site
.yeah