yeah
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
much more tactility
not their contents
all that is to say
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
so the method has to be autonomous
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
as in
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
autonomy of learning
wow, you are the first stranger to write a textwall to me
which magnetises chains of pins
magnetises a pin
isaac
that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
Maybe, Jack, I'm doing this because I'm English?
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate