there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

its good short few pages

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

something religious, a kind of complex,

it will get lighter

i dont understand magnetisation

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

not their contents

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i want to do that too

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

plato

One of the birds shoots out of the tree.

and the fake qualifier

what do you mean

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

i love it here

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it