2 (actually index). two is company

all that is to say

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

have you read

idk

so at the end

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

isaac

what do you mean

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i want to do that too

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

as in

its performative

propensity within someone

sorry i am texting like a slav

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

is this you as well

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

i really havent

no i haven't really read anything

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

abrar?

a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext

that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

lol