there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.ion
its good
idk
i was tempted to lie about my name
abrar?
i really havent
division of reality is straying away from it
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
i love it here
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
autonomy of learning
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
like first name
I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.
Better Lift
She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.
was it worth it
its performative
no like which do people call me