as in
all that is to say
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
propensity within someone
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
autonomy of learning
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
and the fake qualifier
plato
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i really havent
so at the end
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
ion
wait what is that
abrar?
Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.
what do you mean
we can only engage in such a way
send link
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then
your feed looks like my tumblr
plato