think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

not their contents

its performative

you cannot feed someone truth

as in

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

your feed looks like my tumblr

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

propensity within someone

1

i am quite illiterate on producing technology

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

much more tactility

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

all that is to say

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

I wonder if she knew I was down there listening? I wonder if she would've said something more true, more personal, more raw, more heartfelt, more harsh, more seductive, more freeing, more exposing, more risky, more romantic, more rude, more honest, more anything, if there hadn't been an audience.

i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike

"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"