not so on: yvf(wthw)
Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.
a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it
and the fake qualifier
wow, you are the first stranger to write a textwall to me
but i respect your search
but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos
a version of this existed for a few months last year but it was static. it was HTML with writing and pictures and videos and sounds. i had this feeling that the code should be as important as the content, that structurally each piece in relation to each other piece shouldn't change, that the mazelike quality should emerge from me intricately arranging paths through it. like classic hypertext
December 2025
not their contents
like first name
I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.
its good
much more tactility
13 | | | H | | | . . . . | . . . . | . . . . | . . . . | |
wait what is that
yes
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
was it worth it
idk
Can I see
you cannot feed someone truth