there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
is this you as well
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
abrar?
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i really havent
feel you
yeah
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
so the method has to be autonomous
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
...
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then
The bird dives back into the tree. It shakes, some leaves fall.
Above and in front two birds are darting in and out of a tree. Sometimes they collide to fight or maybe mate, but I can't really make it out in the low light. It's just after
dusk
, I have nothing to do, I'm watching them, trying to figure it out.mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
division of reality is straying away from it
the site i am dreaming
ahnaf abrar
as in
all that is to say
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away