you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
division of reality is straying away from it
all that is to say
so the method has to be autonomous
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
your feed looks like my tumblr
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
as in
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
that looks like my instagram account
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
propensity within someone
send link
wait what is that
so at the end
much more tactility
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
and the fake qualifier