i have read not even 1 book

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

much more tactility

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

lol

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

abrar?

its performative

not their contents

no i haven't really read anything

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

yeah

yes

Lift Analysis

ion

lol yea

the textwall is as much for me as it is for you

you cannot feed someone truth

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

isaac newton

what do you think my name is

division of reality is straying away from it

and the fake qualifier