was it worth it

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

autonomy of learning

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

not their contents

send your tumblr

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

sorry i am texting like a slav

isaac

magnetises a pin

no i haven't really read anything

have you read

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i dont understand magnetisation

its good

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

ion

that looks like my instagram account

thank you

so the method has to be autonomous

plato

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

like first name

its performative

i love it here

and the fake qualifier

like magnets

you cannot feed someone truth

whats your name?

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

isaac newton

which magnetises chains of pins

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything