I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.
no longer writing in the third person
I'm trying to picture the scene inside, like I was trying to picture the scene in the tree.
I am below everything.
Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 21:22:59
She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.
you cannot feed someone truth
in a post. I want to be remembered
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
lol yea
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
have you read
propensity within someone
plato
"Put a blanket."
One of the birds shoots out of the tree.
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i understand
I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?
what do you think my name is
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
lol