kind of mythopoesis

so the method has to be autonomous

i understand

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

whats your name?

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

division of reality is straying away from it

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

no i haven't really read anything

is everyoneback on tumblr now

much more tactility

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

idk

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

like first name

not their contents

and the fake qualifier

2 (actually index). two is company

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

the site i am dreaming

i really havent

yeah

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

its good short few pages