nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

so the method has to be autonomous

idk

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

all that is to say

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

you cannot feed someone truth

plato

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

not their contents

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

i want to do that too

propensity within someone

Above and behind a window opens and a cigarette hangs out.

She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

I am below everything.

there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.

I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?

"No, it'll get cold!"
"Put a tut ahh put a-"

i really havent

send link

December 2025

brb i will read and reply sincerely