i understand

And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

and the fake qualifier

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

no like which do people call me

i dont understand magnetisation

all that is to say

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

autonomy of learning

we can only engage in such a way

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

its good

no i haven't really read anything

sorry i am texting like a slav

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

we need to be deconstructing our identities

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

its good short few pages

as in

I wonder if she knew I was down there listening? I wonder if she would've said something more true, more personal, more raw, more heartfelt, more harsh, more seductive, more freeing, more exposing, more risky, more romantic, more rude, more honest, more anything, if there hadn't been an audience.