have you read

sorry i am texting like a slav

is this you as well

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

lol

its good

its good

or never left

whats your name?

fw

i want to do that too

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

we can only engage in such a way

ahnaf abrar

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

what do you think my name is

what do you mean

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

magnetisation/form

i understand

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

magnetises a pin

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

which magnetises chains of pins

bro i read nothing in my life

a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it