so at the end
that looks like my instagram account
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
lol yea
all that is to say
have you read
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
abrar?
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
lol
no like which do people call me
i dont understand magnetisation
which magnetises chains of pins
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
like first name
feel you
your feed looks like my tumblr
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
its good short few pages
whats your name?
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
wait what is that
god being the centre magnet