you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.plato
so the method has to be autonomous
magnetisation/form
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
yeah
no like which do people call me
i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
feel you
we can only engage in such a way
as in
what do you think my name is
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
that looks like my instagram account
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i want to do that too
division of reality is straying away from it
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i dont understand magnetisation
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
autonomy of learning
so at the end
ion
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
wow, you are the first stranger to write a textwall to me
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.