and the fake qualifier
idk
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
autonomy of learning
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
propensity within someone
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
so at the end
lol
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
division of reality is straying away from it
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
you cannot feed someone truth
or never left
its good
send your tumblr
isaac newton
its good
what do you mean
we can only engage in such a way
ion
its performative
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
plato
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
was it worth it
i have read not even 1 book