this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

as in

send your tumblr

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

so at the end

not their contents

yeah

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

autonomy of learning

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

idk

magnetisation/form

isaac newton

I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

Rain, starting

13, H, grate

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

no i haven't really read anything

        13       |
                |
                |
            H   |
                |
                |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
                |

sorry i am texting like a slav

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

which magnetises chains of pins

theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine