we want to live the knowledge too live the content

and the fake qualifier

what do you think my name is

abrar?

i love it here

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

i want to do that too

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

ahnaf abrar

you cannot feed someone truth

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

that looks like my instagram account

magnetisation/form

so an active mazelike process

idk

lol

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

as in

propensity within someone

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

all that is to say

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

i really havent

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

i have read not even 1 book

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

its performative

but i respect your search

She closes the window. I wasn't paying attention anyway, I'm getting cold, and the birds are nowhere to be seen. I go inside.

have you read