there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:
so the method has to be autonomous
all that is to say
its performative
like first name
and the fake qualifier
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
i have read not even 1 book
thank you
we can only engage in such a way
autonomy of learning
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
i was tempted to lie about my name
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
feel you
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
no like which do people call me