ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
i dont understand magnetisation
so the method has to be autonomous
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
god being the centre magnet
barren land
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
what do you mean
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
magnetises a pin
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
thank you
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
isaac
is everyoneback on tumblr now
and the fake qualifier
i really havent
yeah
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.
which magnetises chains of pins
I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
Better Lift