i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

no i haven't really read anything

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

as in

isaac

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

much more tactility

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

have you read

plato

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

that looks like my instagram account

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

you cannot feed someone truth

i dont understand magnetisation

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

send your tumblr

whats your name?

i understand

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

so at the end

plato

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

thank you

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

ahnaf abrar

and the fake qualifier

like first name

autonomy of learning