the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
you cannot feed someone truth
not their contents
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
propensity within someone
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
much more tactility
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
i want to do that too
magnetises a pin
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 21:22:59
fw
we can only engage in such a way
I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?
isaac newton
"Put a blanket."
Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:27:13
Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:38:49
yes
i really havent