i understand

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

much more tactility

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

is this you as well

i dont understand magnetisation

you cannot feed someone truth

its good

sorry i am texting like a slav

abrar?

isaac newton

isaac

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

its good short few pages

that looks like my instagram account

yeah

idk

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

ion

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i love it here

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

have you read

so the method has to be autonomous

i want to do that too

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

as in

magnetises a pin

bro i read nothing in my life

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

what do you mean

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt

plato

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

yeah