propensity within someone
so at the end
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
idk
so an active mazelike process
have you read
so the method has to be autonomous
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
was it worth it
what do you mean
whats your name?
thank you
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
like first name
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.ion
something religious, a kind of complex,
it will get lighter
, something washing, cleansing, revealing, etc.i really havent
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
the site i am dreaming
its good
Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.