there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
bro i read nothing in my life
and the fake qualifier
was it worth it
i really havent
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
not so on: yvf(wthw)
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
lol
autonomy of learning
have you read
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
much more tactility
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
its good
ion
its good
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.
isaac newton
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
its good short few pages
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️
we can only engage in such a way
i dont understand magnetisation
like magnets
Better Lift