...

no i haven't really read anything

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

so an active mazelike process

lol yea

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

so the method has to be autonomous

you cannot feed someone truth

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

yeah

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

Thank you, Jack

I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

plato

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

send link

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

currently

no like which do people call me

ion