...

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

plato

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i really havent

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

your feed looks like my tumblr

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

we need to be deconstructing our identities

what do you think my name is

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

like first name

as in

i want to do that too

and the fake qualifier

i dont understand magnetisation

which magnetises chains of pins

magnetisation/form

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

we can only engage in such a way

is this you as well

its good short few pages

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

no like which do people call me

barren land

i have read not even 1 book

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

isaac

but really the thing should be autonomous

have you read

is everyoneback on tumblr now