my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

propensity within someone

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

abrar?

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

that looks like my instagram account

i love it here

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

was it worth it

its good

is this you as well

what do you think my name is

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

no like which do people call me

so an active mazelike process

not their contents

we need to be deconstructing our identities

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

Rain, starting

god being the centre magnet

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

i really havent

magnetises a pin

        13       |
                |
                |
            H   |
                |
                |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
                |

i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike

so the method has to be autonomous

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

yeah

i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me