the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
not so on: yvf(wthw)
fw
yeah
...
is everyoneback on tumblr now
and the fake qualifier
was it worth it
we can only engage in such a way
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.
autonomy of learning
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
barren land
yeah
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
sorry i am texting like a slav
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
what do you think my name is
not their contents
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
i love it here